Anytime anything popular gets dragged here there’s always a few “let people enjoy things” and “don’t ruin peoples fun” and “don’t be a weird cynical hipster” and what have you.

Except for the most popular series of children books in history. For whatever reason that’s apparently weapons free for Hater Team 6 to go to town on. I’ve seen people say was shouldn’t ruin peoples “favorite toy” when it comes to sports, Twilight, Marvel Movies and astrology, but what makes those sacrosanct and Harry Potter fair game?

This applies somewhat to Hamilton too.

You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments
38 points

Would like to echo that there’s a difference between “enjoying” something and “identifying with” something.

I liked the Harry Potter series when I was younger, like it a bit less after some things that were pointed out and the ideas that JK not only expresses but openly advocating for.

I absolutely loved Ender’s Game when I was growing up but the author is absolutely trash. I keep meaning to find a copy to reread as a middle aged adult instead of a tween/teenager.

Hamilton is actually dangerous. Smarter people than me have pointed out that its revisionist as fuck and people are actively thinking they are learning history from consuming the slop from that trough.

permalink
report
reply

Why is Hamilton so dangerous?

permalink
report
parent
reply
34 points
*

I’m not enough of a history aficionado to be able to copy/pasta bullet points. Sorry.

But from some of the history themed podcasts I’ve listened to over the years that talked about the musical, their opinion was that it was ahistorical.

It would be like a Hitler/Third Reich musical that frames their part in WW2 as just trying to build up their economy and give their people something to be proud of after their loss during WW1. But completely omitting all the atrocities, racism, institutionalized evil, etc.

This might not be horrible, except that there are people who think that they are learning US history by watching/listening to Hamilton.

permalink
report
parent
reply
22 points

It would be like a Hitler/Third Reich musical that frames their part in WW2 as just trying to build up their economy and give their people something to be proud of after their loss during WW1. But completely omitting all the atrocities, racism, institutionalized evil, etc.

To extend your metaphor, your Springtime for Hitler would tout a Jewish cast to laud itself as progressive and further launder the third reich’s reputation

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
14 points

You literally described “Springtime for Hitler” from the producers.

permalink
report
parent
reply