Timestamps:

0:00 - Introduction

04:12 - Pigs

23:19 - Egg-Laying Hens

30:49 - Broiler (Meat) Chickens

41:11 - Turkeys

45:29 - Ducks

53:03 - Cows

1:11:07 - Sheep

1:17:19 - Goats

1:21:57 - Fish

1:26:46 - Rabbits

1:29:24 - Minks

1:30:55 - Foxes

1:32:23 - Dogs

1:37:58 - Horses

1:40:43 - Camels

1:42:16 - Mice

1:43:51 - Exotic Animals

1:46:07 - Seals & Dolphins

1:49:16 - Conclusion

1:55:47 - Closing Credits

This was the doc that sold me fully on going vegan.

If you like meat, learn more about where it comes and the practices you are promoting to access it, then decide whether or not to continue.

You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments View context
-3 points
*

at the end of the day Locally sourced >> Vegan. I know I’m not going to change any minds in this comment section, but like veganism isn’t inherently good

permalink
report
parent
reply

Locally sourced >> Vegan

Torture done locally is not a good or better thing for the animals or the environment.

permalink
report
parent
reply

It is better for the environment. Local eggs and butter is better than international egg replacement and international olive oil.

Take off the torture goggles and understand that farmers (as in not factory) treat their animals well as they make better produce.

permalink
report
parent
reply

Local eggs and butter mean local chickens and cows and if where you live has imported plant-food for people, it has imported plant-food for the animals.

It’s worse folks.

permalink
report
parent
reply
19 points

The opposite is true. Meat is extremely inefficient.

permalink
report
parent
reply
-7 points
*

So nearby animal products are more inefficient than flying quinoa, soy, coconuts, etc into your country?

PS I don’t eat beef bc of this efficiency argument, but I find it hard to believe for other animal products as native and indigenous people have been carnivorously eating off the land for millennia without problem

permalink
report
parent
reply

PS I don’t eat beef bc of this efficiency argument, but I find it hard to believe for other animal products as native and indigenous people have been carnivorously eating off the land for millennia without problem

This argument doesn’t hold as much water when you consider that Earth’s population is 15-20 times what it was 2000 years ago.

permalink
report
parent
reply

So nearby animal products are more inefficient than flying quinoa, soy, coconuts, etc into your country?

Correct. Environmental impact is often unintuitive, so here’s a good overview

permalink
report
parent
reply
14 points

Yes because farm animals need to eat and their food is also often imported. Something like 70-90% of soy is grown for animal agriculture, etc.

Grass-fed animals are also bad for the environment for different reasons.

permalink
report
parent
reply

Main

!main@hexbear.net

Create post

THE MAIN RULE: ALL TEXT POSTS MUST CONTAIN “MAIN” OR BE ENTIRELY IMAGES (INLINE OR EMOJI)

(Temporary moratorium on main rule to encourage more posting on main. We reserve the right to arbitrarily enforce it whenever we wish and the right to strike this line and enforce mainposting with zero notification to the users because its funny)

A hexbear.net commainity. Main sure to subscribe to other communities as well. Your feed will become the Lion’s Main!

Good comrades mainly sort posts by hot and comments by new!


State-by-state guide on maintaining firearm ownership

Domain guide on mutual aid and foodbank resources

Tips for looking at financials of non-profits (How to donate amainly)

Community-sourced megapost on the main media sources to radicalize libs and chuds with

An Amainzing Organizing Story

Main Source for Feminism for Babies

Maintaining OpSec / Data Spring Cleaning guide


Remain up to date on what time is it in Moscow

Community stats

  • 131

    Monthly active users

  • 38K

    Posts

  • 385K

    Comments