BlueHairWithGuns [they/them]
I mean, first, AI generated art is even easier to make then pop songs are, and second, visual arts being brought to the same place as music is still enough to suck. A lot.
Third, it’s hard to tell the difference between AI generated art and human-made art, while pop music is it’s own distinct genre which is separated from other genres in both quality and intention. While AI generated art can come very close to human made art in quality, and it’s only difference in the long term is intention.
I’m sorry I was so touchy, as an art hobbyist myself seeing computers just… conjure images has really demotivated me, because I can just see people in the future actually saying to me “why do you draw you can just use DALLE” so I’m unhealthily invested in this subject. I’m making one more post and then logging off for a bit, actually (which I know is funny on a brand new account).
i agree with this, and i’m not sure how you got the idea that i didn’t. again, sorry i misread your thing, you are right to be worried, and i totally get if my post isn’t reassuring at all because i don’t know too much about this, i just know that behind the curtain there’s a lot of fiddling going on to make this tech seem more advanced than it is.
I was paranoid because I’ve seen the take that artists just need to “adapt” and make new art styles a few times. I’m sorry, again, I’m sorry for being so confrontational.
Honestly, neither of those things are comforting for me and mean nothing to someone who does art as a job and relies on it to live.
“most people aren’t doing particularly unique art rn”
People shouldn’t need to do “unique” art for their self expression to be valuable. Fuck that.
What artists need right now is material support and material reasons for their job to continue to exist, not abstract notions of “human expression” or “fulfillment”.
I’m going to make a machine to wedgie techbros at inhuman speeds.