GenEcon
A russian-paid propagandist claims something no one can confirm or deny. So we have to trust him on this. So hin trustworthy is he? While he has some credibility from back in 2004, his claims made since 2018 are completely out of his mind. So as long as no second source confirms this, this claim is worth nothing.
So why did his opinion change between 2004 and 2018? Or why did he switch sides? In between he was cought twice in approaching minors in sexual ways and was even in jail for that. After serving his sentence he flew to Russia.
He claims for example that Ukraine committed the Butcha massacre - while Russia was in control of Butcha during the time the massacre took place. He also claimed that Syria - a russian ally - had no chemical weapons. Later chemical weapons were used by Syria during the war. All while being paid by the Russia state. Every critical thinker should dismiss these claims.
Thanks for that effort - and sorry for the late answer. Sync didnt push that notification to me. Guess we need some discussion in our society when sex work is voluntary and therefore fine and in which cases sex work seems voluntary but is in fact forced by economic and outside forces (in this case Russia) and therefore can’t be voluntary.
Thats why most capitalist nations do have a public broadcast additionally to freedom of the press.
‘Western Media’ - never heard of this site. Got any sources where it gets promoted?
Its from China developing and needing more energy. Has very little to so with electrification, especially not the two you mention. Smartphones have no impact at all and EVs are not having a significant market share yet.
Funny, because the energy sector was the only on track to fulfill the targets. Last year it even overshot its targets and is expected to again save more CO2 as planned in 2023.
Maybe, just maybe, its more relevant that other sectors are managed by the FDP (market liberals) and SPD (social democrats), while energy is managed by die Grünen (greens).