Potap [she/her]

I see. That was the terminology used in the video by the autism advocacy guy.

Haven’t terminator seeds been a thing for quite some time?

But that’s the thing, good art isn’t just about what most people want or what’s popular. Some would even argue that art that touches some people in a way that is not mathematically quantifiable is more important than a quality people pleasing product with mass appeal.

I mean, I can buy the idea that a concept of badass US soldiers fighting fantasy monsters is more palatable to a lot of Americans than just a weird fantasy universe they’ve never heard about.

Lmao, what else did you expect from computer people? At least they are not a “race realist” lolbertarian or something.

Mood

The guy was fired for attending some sort of white pride event so it probably is.

Autism Speaks seems to be a horrible organisation, but the guy in the video arguing that developing a genetic cure to autism would be a genocide, actually, - a bit silly. I’m not an autism expert this whole “low need autism is just autism in low IQ people who got abused” seems like crank science, right? Also, weird how he goes for the blindness comparison, considering how deafness advocats were probably the first to use his “culture not illness” argument.

My man former PM of Malaysia with a nuclear take.

It excludes designers and artists I guess.