VictimOfReligion
Cult survivor. Against most forms of religions, specially anti-scientist ones such as all Abrahamism, and will always explain why. I will never stop demonstrating that religion is reactionary, including your own beliefs. Dialectical Materialism is a must in Socialism that cannot be forgotten.
Dafuq happened? I was out for a time
Marxism is not more popular in the west, wtf is this idiot talking about? The west mostly have Anarkids and Frankfurter Suckdems, which are basically chauvinistic racists that want to portray themselves as “holier than thou” because they are “protecting” the minorities they are part of or are trendy while at the same time shitting in the ones they aren’t part nor trendy.
Ah, and full of idealist nonsense.
Really, fuck them.
Can’t believe that gringos will get left enough to stop being simply blue MAGAs
Edit: just to be understood. I’m not claiming that believers deserve the wall de facto, and I even know that the first victims of religion and who face the class struggle, are precisely the believers the same way people living in the imperial core are victims too.
I’m sorry, but those believes aren’t separated from protecting the same church. The problem with religion is that they are ideologies, and those ideologies have the first primal indoctrination that affects even to non believers, that is that the institution must be protected at all cost, even from itself, in a really very simmilar way that capitalism has socdems and fascists. They are very different in the outside, but they have the same purpose.
And another thing, is that the institution isn’t bourgeois, it’s theocracist.
Right now is in bed with the bourgeoisie because the later is what it has power. Historically, the church was in bed always with the system and power that was dominant and at the same time, struggling to attain absolute power, being in an friendship/rivalry the same way today the nobility and aristocracy is in bed with the bourgeoisie.
BTW, I don’t know what a “reddit atheist” is, but it sounds to me like “the good socialist is never “radical””, “the good feminist is the one that doesn’t accuse men for everything”, “the good union is the one that allways collaborate with the boss”, “the good atheist never speaks the harms of religion”. Can’t you see the pattern, comrade?
You cam argue that depending on context you may talk to them to letting it go (I did, I could make some children think about it and they really stopped being fascists, don’t know how much time, but at least something), but liberals will never understand context and how counter measures work… Unless it is for their own benefit.
I feel you. I have family I never met because during Spanish Civil War, they were killed by NationalCatholics, being the Church one of the principal instigators against communism, anarchism, and even atheism or minimal worker’s rights.
The ones that were older were even sent to concentration camps were Franco sent people to please Hitler as collaborators, while the Spanish right claims that Franco “remained neutral”.
And I have to hear that I must not hate neither the right nor Catholicism because “that’s authoritarian” or its “bigotry against Christianity” and similar nonsense.
The only reason not to punch a fucking nazi is because they could harm you or the police work hand in hand and will know who you are and where you live or something. If you know you won’t have this repercussions or simply don’t give a fuck, kicking their ass is the moral thing to do, and liberals can suck your ass.
And of course, when was the last time you heard a liberal say that “punching tankies is bad”? Because I NEVER heard them claiming that we also have free speech and all that nonsense they cry when a Nazi gets what it deserves.