bufalo1973

So the short version is: Nazi attacks rabbi.

GREAT! I was mistaken by some comments and I though it didn’t exist. I [wrongly] understood that every sign language was “tied” to the local language to the degree of not being understood in other countries.

Thank you for correcting my (flawed) knowledge 🙂

If I put here a 🙂 you understand that’s a smile, ever if I call it “sonrisa” or “somriure”. What I mean is “normalize” the common things between languages. Not erasing localisms. After all every language has synonyms. This could be a “common synonym”.

To ease the communication?

I’ve always heard that different sign language have different signs for the same significant.

I mean that the significant is the same. A flower is a flower, regardless of the name you give it.

The worst part is that there is no standard between languages. After all, you can call an apple “apple”, " manzana", “pome”, " poma", … and it’s always the same thing. So the sign should be the same, right?

The Onion?

Next time, Vin Diesel as MLK.

Almost the same logic that have the Dark Judges: every crime is committed by living persons hence live itself is a crime.