cecinestpasunbot
I’m open to being proven wrong but I just don’t think it’s viable. It’s not as simple as throwing a few cells in a bioreactor.
To make this commercially viable you would have to develop a very efficient supply chain to produce all the complex nutrients and hormones necessary to grown animal tissues in vitro. You would have to do this without relying on the byproducts of animal agriculture as is currently the case. Most of the research I’ve read kind of hand waves away that issue.
Next, you have to culture animal tissues at an industrial scale. This is the challenge some researchers are trying to address. I think this may be possible but it’s unlikely to be very efficient. You still need to “feed” your cells over a long period of time as muscle tissue does not grow quickly, even when stimulated with hormones.
Lastly, if you somehow find solutions to all those problems I think it’s unlikely you’ll have a product that closely imitates the taste an texture of meat. Animal tissues are complex. They contain a variety of cell types and extra cellular proteins that no attempt at lab grown meat has come close to replicating. I think it’s next to impossible for them to get cells to grow into a complex tissue like they would in vivo. So instead you’ll be left trying to cobble together a cell based mush full of antibiotics and growth hormones into something that looks edible.
The alternative is just using plant protein as a basis for meat alternatives. That’s something the CPC is also supporting. Personally I’m already pretty impressed by what’s available now. Improving it to a point where people will be comfortable giving up meat seems much more viable in my opinion than lab grown meat.
It’s kind of funny that actual US border crossing have way more cameras.
I actually think the majority of white people genuinely believe racism is unacceptable. The problem is that they often adopt classicism as drop in replacement for white supremacy. It helps to perpetuate racial inequality and segregation in the same way. However, they’re less likely to get any pushback for being classist. Of course because racial inequality persists, that classism will get mapped back onto racial characteristics. It’s not dissimilar to how anti-Chinese propaganda feeds into hatred for Asian people. The net result is that prejudice remains even though white supremacy is not the vibrant ideological project it once was. It also means that it’s difficult for someone to understand how they’re supporting white supremacy unless they to begin to question class society as a whole.
It’s amazing to be that anyone credulously believed that China was trying to secretly spy on the US using such a comically large balloon. It would be hilarious if it weren’t for the fact that the media frenzy surrounding it echos the claims that Iraq had WMDs. The US press didn’t question the military’s narrative then and it isn’t questioning it now.
It started pretty early into the war after Ukraine accused Russia of massacring civilians. They also willfully misinterpret Russian propaganda, which questions the legitimacy of the Ukrainian state, as a genocidal threat. There’s also the thing about orphans in Russian occupied areas getting adopted by Russians.
Do they really love him though? My sense was mainly that this was an “enemy of my enemy is my friend” type of situation. Russia’s breakaway from western economies is an opportunity for countries in the global south. As such it makes sense that the left in those countries would aim to foster positive relations with Putin and the Russian government. That’s regardless of what they privately think about the guy.
I’m pretty sure they don’t actually want to escalate tensions with one of their biggest customers. It just doesn’t make sense for them. The US however is in a catch 22. US companies save tons of money by manufacturing in China but Chinese economic growth threatens the geopolitical dominance the US has enjoyed since WW2.