data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a4c9d/a4c9db6983a6f4bd9bb714c0af75865cb73edfce" alt="Avatar"
incontinentiabuttock [none/use name]
It definitely is our concern if someone is living in a space the size of a closet. Supporting that undermines leftist urban planning causes. Humans may be able to survive in a small confined space, they may be able to fulfill their needs using communal amenities, they could eat nutrient paste, they could wear cheap utiltarian clothing, we could all live extreme ascetic lifestyles and technically it could fulfill our needs but people have desires, settling the issue of what treats people may have must be done eventually, and if we are going to be telling normal people offline that 70 sq ft of personal space is a treat they will be right to dislike us.
It would be a bad look though to promote living spaces smaller than US prison cells, no? When I was a kid I had to share a room and we put a curtains up for privacy, when I lived in a dorm I shared an even smaller room, and the communal bathroom we had was disgusting. Now that I’m renting I do appreciate having the privacy and luxury of my own toilet and private bedroom. If I had full control of the housing market I would at least regulate some kind of minimum personal space per occupant in new houses.