Mr. Beedell, Roke JL
My GitLab profile’s readMe.MD states:
Hello. My first name is Roke, and I always shall, and have been since I gained my first computer, a software developer. I specialize in OS architectures and GUI consistency, accessibility, and ease of use.
If interesting, I’ve also posted at the XDA Developers forum about whether this is more broadly applicable.
Really impressive work. SystemD was the sole thing missing from PMOS for me – I’m ecstatic that I’ll finally be able to say, when it’s done, that – excluding 3rd-party GUIs’ support – it’s better than AOSP.
Thank you. I’ll use that information about the USB ID for my report to KDE. However, could you elaborate somewhat? That is, would it be correct to ask for Plasma to not merely utilize the USB ID to identify whether a device is accessible, but test whether it can be accessed by MTP first, before presenting that option to the user? Regardless, per what you’ve said, I’ve consolidated my previously disparate reports under https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=486931.
Additionally, I’ll definitely mention on Bugzilla that incorporating some of the patches in that package would be a feasible implementation method. Relevantly, I’d like to use that package, but because I’m not using Edge, would adding that repository do any harm (for instance, would it be added with higher priority by default than existent repositories)?
This has been one of the major reasons I’ve not yet used PMOS. Brilliant news!
You should have just linked to the page. It would have embedded the image, right?