Avatar

verdigris

verdigris@lemmy.ml
Joined
0 posts • 37 comments
Direct message

I can’t find any logically consistent way too label piracy as immoral. It doesn’t remove the original and it’s just creating virtually free copies. It’s the definition of a victimless crime.

The fact that you’re hypothetically removing profit from the creator only becomes a moral issue if that loss of profit is A) guaranteed, that is, the recipient of the free copy would definitely have paid for it otherwise, and B) is significant enough to impact their life negatively. And the latter happening is much more an indictment of the system that demands people justify their existence through the extraction of profit than it is of the consumers who are just copying a few bytes.

The idea of paying more than a few cents for any digital media is frankly absurd. It’s highway robbery that we’re paying the same amount to rent a copy of a movie as to buy a pound of meat or a gallon of gas. It’s 99% just blatant price gouging.

permalink
report
reply

“I used Windows all my life and am unwilling to learn anything new”

permalink
report
parent
reply

GitHub (since the Microsoft acquisition) is good to users because that’s their MO, it’s called Embrace, Extend, Extinguish, and the whole point is to centralize users and projects and make them dependent on the Microsoft ecosystem.

Of course now there’s also the whole issue of Copilot, which means any code you put on GitHub could very well show up piecemeal in someone’s AI-generated code. If it wasn’t for that novel avenue of monetization, you can bet your ass GitHub would have already made the free user experience a lot shittier.

permalink
report
parent
reply

From the comment thread it sounds like the contract might be on shaky ground. The original dev seems to be under the impression that a project licensed under GPLv3 can just be freely changed to another license, which it cannot without explicit consent from all contributors. We don’t know the contract language of course, but the dev said it would “likely” not remain open source, which indicates that he told them they could change it. ZippApps’ lawyers will hopefully notice that and refuse to buy, though either way we shouldn’t trust this maintainer again and should move to the forks.

permalink
report
reply

Holy fuck how is this not an onion article title…

permalink
report
reply

You just grew up using Windows and are used to its design language – that doesn’t make it inherently intuitive.

If you are fucking with path variables you’re already a power user. The settings for an OOTB Ubuntu or other user-friendly distro are pretty damn intuitive, and if you’re dealing with anything more complex, I personally would far rather use bash or other Linux shells than Powershell.

permalink
report
parent
reply

The thing is, they are materially worse than other consumer vehicles. They do all the bad things but more, and their normalization makes it all worse for everyone – have you seen the size of parking spaces in Europe?

permalink
report
parent
reply

To be fair that’s basically what ends up happening to recycling in a lot of communities anyway…

permalink
report
parent
reply

Brother beards have been in for like 10 years.

permalink
report
reply

This concept is the “third space” – a social space other than work and home where people can congregate, socialize, and relax. Parks and libraries are some of the only remaining spaces in capitalism where people can be humans without paying for the privilege to exist by the minute.

permalink
report
reply