reject nuance

ambrace monke

that man’s name? Albert Einstein

thought-provoking content!

i litterally just posted hog you absolute chump

I understand your point of view, but it’s impossible to ignore.

1. These arguments are indeed easy for reactionaries to twist. That doesn’t mean the basic arguments are inherently wrong.
2. “inclusive language, inclusivity, and cultural appropriation” are three separate things, only one is based in language.
3. A major problem in leftist circles is that we start to create a language that nobody outside the circles can understand, much less identify with. of course this goes both ways! We have to ask, do we want to organize the normies or the college kids? Do we want to be the HR wing of capital?
4. It’s one thing to be upset over slurs, but another thing to be upset over pronouns, that are such an ingrained, basically reptile brain use of language.
5. Rapists can use shibboleths too, proper language is no guarantee for equality.

they are literally old babies. i remember in middle school when i thought skulls were the shit

oh yeah then what is this :PIGPOOPBALLS:

immediately made incoherent by the fact that Tibet was liberated (in their minds authoritarianly occupied) by Mao (who they supposedly support)

after bombing muslims, including uighurs, for several centuries, the US conservatives suddenly decided that they care about their plight. did you also believe Saddam had WMDs?

Sino-Soviet Split Episode II: Electric Boogaloo