You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments
65 points

I hate this shit so much. We went through this same bad faith argument with the last Godzilla movie: critics give it shit for focusing on boring human characters with bad dialogue and morons who can only read headlines think the critics are mad that it focuses too much on Godzilla somehow. It’s especially nauseating since Godzilla and King Kong were originally ABOUT things. Godzilla was about the consequences of nuclear war, King Kong was about the evils of colonialism, but now they are just IP that smash into each other in boring military propaganda movies.

permalink
report
reply
30 points

Idk, it’s often the same critics who praise the MCU movies, which are also poorly written military propaganda. So it’s not like them disliking monke vs lizard is some anti-imperalist stance.

permalink
report
parent
reply
23 points

the main problem with MCU movies though is that they’re just dull, nothing ever happens in them

permalink
report
parent
reply
27 points
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply

Wow. You could have just not posted this, you know.

permalink
report
parent
reply
17 points

King Kong was about the evils of colonialism

The most recent King Kong was still about this. Monke absolutely massacreing American marines just after they got their asses beat by the VC.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

King Kong is based???

permalink
report
parent
reply
19 points

The theme of the Skull Island was definitely “indigenous have the right to defend their land” and it wasn’t subtle.

permalink
report
parent
reply
17 points

King Kong was about the evils of colonialism

I’ve never heard this interpretation of King Kong, can you elaborate?

permalink
report
parent
reply
45 points

Kong represents the slave trade, and is exploited by the white people and revolts. He’s the hero of the film and the people who kidnap and abuse him are the bad guys.

It’s not super coherent, but it’s definitely at least marginally anti-colonial.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points
*

Yeah, every time a blockbuster gets shitty reviews there are people who try to conjure this stereotype of a snooty film critic who just doesn’t understand fun. Then you look up “Superhero sequel number 42069” on Rotten Tomatoes and it has like 98%. What gives? Where are my pretentious film snobs?

This monkey movie seems well-reviewed thought.

permalink
report
parent
reply

Kind of reminds me about the discourse around Pacific Rim. People were criticizing the bland romance plot that dominated the screen (and got immediately dumped in the sequel, to add) but there was a narrative about anyone who didn’t like PR was just a pretentious snob who can’t enjoy a movie about robots and monsters.

permalink
report
parent
reply

memes

!memes@hexbear.net

Create post

dank memes

Rules:

  1. All posts must be memes and follow a general meme setup.

  2. No unedited webcomics.

  3. Someone saying something funny or cringe on twitter/tumblr/reddit/etc. is not a meme. Post that stuff in !the_dunk_tank@www.hexbear.net, it’s a great comm.

  4. Va*sh posting is haram and will be removed.

  5. Follow the code of conduct.

  6. Tag OC at the end of your title and we’ll probably pin it for a while if we see it.

  7. Recent reposts might be removed.

  8. Tagging OC with the hexbear watermark is praxis.

  9. No anti-natalism memes. See: Eco-fascism Primer

Community stats

  • 26

    Monthly active users

  • 17K

    Posts

  • 143K

    Comments