You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments View context
46 points

dude 200 km/h is already too much. Vehicles that don’t follow tracks and are conducted by random idiots shouldn’t go faster than 120 km /h

permalink
report
parent
reply

I was being lenient but yeah. Here the speed limit on highways is 120km/h/75mph, in some areas of the world 130kph/81mph, so the limit can’t be that low otherwise there would be no overtaking and it would make highway travel dangerous.

Also 120mph is 192km/h, not 200. I know the limiter in Japan for all road cars is 180kph/112mph. So around there or less is more realistic. Personally I think a limit at 160kph/100mph should still allow for pretty much all overtakes to be completed safely on the highway.

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points

It’s generally legal to exceed the limit briefly for the purpose of overtaking, so long as it’s not sustained

permalink
report
parent
reply

Yeah that’s why you can’t have cars mechanically limited to the speed limit, it would make overtaking impossible/dangerous.

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points
*

You are not supposed to exceed the speed limit on the highway when overtaking. If the speed limit is 130 km/h and you’re already driving that you have no use for overtaking.

permalink
report
parent
reply

I mean unless you want the overtake to take a long period of time (which can be dangerous when you’re on a one lane road and have to go into the oncoming lane to overtake), it’s better to exceed the speed limit briefly during the overtake and spend less time in the oncoming lane. Obviously don’t blast past trucks/trailers at 160km/h/100mph+, but briefly going 5 or 10 over during an overtake of a long truck/trailer is fine, and better than spending more time in the oncoming lane.

permalink
report
parent
reply
17 points
*

But how will I run from police choppers with 120km/h?

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

:technical:

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

force = mass * acceleration

so if we want less people to die on roads, we should limit speed based upon mass of the vehicle

if you want to drive around in a metal cage that weighs more than a ton, then your speed limit is gonna be much lower than less massive vehicles

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

I like the spirit of it, but accidents happen because people have different velocities

permalink
report
parent
reply

Imagine getting stuck behind 2 buses trying to pass while going 6 and 6.2 mph on a 80 mph highway.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

the basilisk of car culture

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

No buses, all train

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points

An extremely well functioning ambulance service, even in rural areas, is a prerequisite for this. So, not gonna happen lol :doomer:

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points
*

Yeh nobody is trying to ban ambulances, nor firefighters trucks, nor disabled people’s cars, nor utilitary vehicles, nor rural areas cars, those are at most a 5% of all vehicles anyways.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

No, my point is, if you’re rural enough, your best chance is NOT to wait for an ambulance; it’s to have someone else in the household haul ass to the hospital with you as a passenger.

permalink
report
parent
reply

traingang

!urbanism@hexbear.net

Create post

Post as many train pictures as possible.

All about urbanism and transportation, including freight transportation.

Home of train gang

:arm-L::train-shining::arm-R:

Talk about supply chain issues here!

List of cool books and videos about urbanism, transit, and other cool things

Titles must be informative. Please do not title your post “lmao” or use the tired “_____ challenge” format.

Archive links for reactionary sites, including the BBC.

LANDLORDS COWER IN FEAR OF MAOTRAIN

“that train pic is too powerful lmao” - u/Cadende

Community stats

  • 4

    Monthly active users

  • 3.8K

    Posts

  • 44K

    Comments