Siempre estuvo correcto, pendejx ;p

Eh, un retrógrada pendejx.

Yeah it is. People mock the use of e/x in that exact way all the time. “It’s ridiculous, look at me using it wrong on purpose”: Chicxs, mx fux x mx casx y prendx mx computadorx…

First off this is nowhere near calling someone a removed.

But you got to agree the defense against inclusive language they’re using is the same old shit they did, they’re doing with fggot=pto (B-but the language is sacred! It’s so annoying I have to think before I talk! As True Leftists, we know Latins are racist, so we got to be racist to “win” them over!)

Mypoint is that they are imposing themselves over everyone else in a way that is not only questionable, but turning an easy victory into something that antagonizes people sensitive about these things

Oh god, you’re in a leftist space. Almost everything we believe and want here would be “imposting things in latinamerica!!” in some way to the ways they currently are! You wouldn’t have a problem discussing socialism to a latin, even if they’re sensitive because of anti-communist propaganda, you shouldn’t have a problem of trying to respect and promote inclusive language

because of gueros.

Not people in latin america fall into gendered language binaries. Not everything is all-powerful white people poisoning us, the innocent, dumb latins.

Just take the easy win and use latin.

And I like to think you’re still reading after this point, cus I agree. I prefer latin instead of latino-latine-latin@ (tho I’m a bit impartial to this one, it’s true some people have pronouns that don’t end in o-a)-latinx. But I respect its use in the name of inclusion. If you believe spanish should be a more inclusive language, then we’re on the same page. How to make it inclusive, is another issue entirely, but it’s one that’s better discussed and dealt with amongst queer-nb-women latin progressives and not whatever dumb anglo or socially conservative latin can come up with.