I notice that some anthropologist believe all humans were egalitarian in the past, and others believe inequality was more common they we currently we think with hunter gathers.

This seems to along with anthropologist using modern hunter gathers as way to look at the past which is now considered not a best practice from what I read. Which this influenced the egalitarian hunter gathers idea even more.

You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments

I think all “states of nature” are kind of a myth. Some are useful myths, some aren’t. But we’re always informed by history and material conditions - we are “naturally” unnatural as tool users, cooks, etc.

permalink
report
reply
3 points
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

The classic example I always use for this is otters using rocks to break open clams on their bellies. Do animals use tools to create further tools? I can’t quite remember if that’s a uniquely hominid thing or not.

permalink
report
parent
reply

That is true yeah. It’s more trying to imagine a “natural” humanity without tools and such denies our humanity.

After all, “culture” is probably where most of our humanity comes from. Nature can be pretty brutal after all.

permalink
report
parent
reply

askchapo

!askchapo@hexbear.net

Create post

Ask Hexbear is the place to ask and answer thought-provoking questions.

Rules:

  1. Posts must ask a question.

  2. If the question asked is serious, answer seriously.

  3. Questions where you want to learn more about socialism are allowed, but questions in bad faith are not.

  4. Try !feedback@hexbear.net if you’re having questions about regarding moderation, site policy, the site itself, development, volunteering or the mod team.

Community stats

  • 125

    Monthly active users

  • 7.3K

    Posts

  • 164K

    Comments