Permanently Deleted

You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments View context

Graeber goes off on the idea of “rationality” in… one of his books… for the same reason. The implications is that if I’m making a rational argument the other side is irrational, and this is of course almost never true and defeats the whole point of discussing a topic and coming to a consensus.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

the other side is irrational, and this is of course almost never true

Counterpoint: :liberalism:

permalink
report
parent
reply

Fuk. Owned again

permalink
report
parent
reply

askchapo

!askchapo@hexbear.net

Create post

Ask Hexbear is the place to ask and answer thought-provoking questions.

Rules:

  1. Posts must ask a question.

  2. If the question asked is serious, answer seriously.

  3. Questions where you want to learn more about socialism are allowed, but questions in bad faith are not.

  4. Try !feedback@hexbear.net if you’re having questions about regarding moderation, site policy, the site itself, development, volunteering or the mod team.

Community stats

  • 125

    Monthly active users

  • 7.3K

    Posts

  • 164K

    Comments