Or is it just an unfalsifiable claim that’s used to move the goalposts when there’s not sufficient evidence for any of the signs or traits of a genocide? A genocide without deaths, refugees, dehumanizing propaganda, or willful misallocation of resources?
You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments 
6 points
Usually, activities that could be considered cultural genocide are just considered genocide by academics who study mass violence. Like, no one would be like “technically the US isn’t murdering the latin people they inter and assimilate”
