Permanently Deleted
He will have the privilege of being in between two awful presidents (Bush and Trump) and they’ll blame everything on them.
Clinton was between two Bushes and he hasn’t received an indefinite pass on everything.
Libs still love the Clintons.
I don’t see this. I see some libs who love Hillary, but even fewer who will go out of their way to hold up Bill as a Good President. I don’t see anything from the Democratic Party about Bill Clinton that approaches the near-universal reverence Republicans have for Reagan. They’ll defend his record (at least in some areas) if pressed – because that’s what one does with politicians vaguely perceived to be on their side – but they’re willing to be critical of him and by no means is he broadly accepted as a Democratic icon. You don’t see libs calling him the greatest president of all time, for instance.
Their obsession with centrism and reaching across the aisle goes back to Bill, as does their love for “good republicans” with how they talk up Reagan now.
This is all true, but it still doesn’t translate to the type of praise that’s constantly heaped on Reagan.
Why even bother with libs? Go talk to working class people.
Talk to both. You have to counter lib talking points anyway as one way or another you’re inevitably going to encounter them.
This site wastes so much time talking about radicalizing libs when all they’re going to do is vote more every 4 years.
Voting can do good things given the right candidate/issue, and plenty of libs are willing to do more than just showing up to the polls.
