just look at these nonthreatening birds
That makes sense and wasn’t abundantly clear initially. It’s all good man.
In your opinion though, is there no compromise between “we need to live more sustainably” and “we must improve the condition of the western worker”? A socialized redistribution of wealth would ideally be able to provide all with a comfortable living while creating an economy focused on satisfying needs rather than “magic line go up forever”, no?
There are undoubtedly bad actors out there using ecologically themed arguments to say “and this is all the fault of the browns”, but I think saying degrowthers are co-opting their movement is backwards. I think the degrowth’s movement has been co-opted by bad actors because their base tenets grounded in environmental science are so solid. It feels unfair to lump them in with the likes of the neo-malthusians and eco-fascists.
