Yes, I know from a rhetorical perspective they’re a bunch of jerks who do nothing but complain, but is there an actual takedown of their ideological notions? Because just saying they suck without further explanation makes it hard to dismiss them when they pop up. I don’t agree with them, I just want to know why I shouldn’t. Something about statues and logic and being chained in a courtyard with wind and all that. I’m not sure where to put this, sorry.

You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments View context

I was covering my ass because I was worried if I asked without that little disclaimer I would get people thinking I’m a leftcom.

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points

fwiw theres one leftcom who comes on here every few months and writes a couple of long and unreadable sectarian wall-of-text screeds about the real movement to abolish the present state of things and ruthless critique of all that exists, calls everyone else fake marxists and then promptly gets banned again. so kinda like a more boring version of bmf but they do liven up the place a bit

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

That’s called a “shibboleth”, a phrase spoken in an attempt to prove the speaker is on the same side as the audience. It’s a phenomenon that super common in the west.

permalink
report
parent
reply

askchapo

!askchapo@hexbear.net

Create post

Ask Hexbear is the place to ask and answer thought-provoking questions.

Rules:

  1. Posts must ask a question.

  2. If the question asked is serious, answer seriously.

  3. Questions where you want to learn more about socialism are allowed, but questions in bad faith are not.

  4. Try !feedback@hexbear.net if you’re having questions about regarding moderation, site policy, the site itself, development, volunteering or the mod team.

Community stats

  • 125

    Monthly active users

  • 7.3K

    Posts

  • 164K

    Comments