There is a lot of answers but if I’d say just one it would be rejecting the current institutional power. At least right now in our time period. Fully rejecting the imperial state, no matter how much they potentially benefit from it seems like a solid transition

we are all lib so let’s not gatekeep what leftist™️ actually is. I guarantee you were a lib once too(still are, but once too.)

You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments View context
24 points
*

I’ll also add that I’ve been somewhat disillusioned with leftist communities lately, as well. There is so much anger and distrust towards the American political establishment right now, and all we do is make fun of these people for being “so close” without figuring it out.

We all ought to spend more time in communities where people don’t share our beliefs. Be open about the fact that you’re a communist, but don’t argue when people complain about it and don’t announce it at the start.

I’ve found a surprising amount of support when I make Marxist takes in plain language. Usually after several people agree, some guy will be like “uh that’s communism,” and that’s your opportunity to say, "Yes, I’m a communist. You’re absolutely free to disagree with my views. I just think that the current system is pitting us against each other so a few rich guys can get even richer. " Emphasize the division rhetoric because libs eat that shit up.

For some reason, the person typically sees this non-confrontational response and can’t help but go on an 800 word rant hitting every major anti-communist trope. Don’t take the bait. If you have to respond, just smile and shrug with an “Agree to disagree!”

Congrats, you’ve just shown everyone else in the room that the communist is the civil one. I’ve been playing with this tactic a lot lately and it is amazing how quickly people turn on the aggressor. Libs really care so much more about how you deliver the message than the substance of the message. That’s all it takes to get a foot in the door.

From there, you’ve gained the credibility to start propagandizing in earnest. You never want to seem like you’re trying to convince anybody - like the liberals, you have to pretend that simply holding the right moral beliefs is enough. Talk about the material conditions, but use moralism to hammer your points home. Use lib-friendly quotes from your favorite works of theory, and when they ask about it, offer to lend them a book. If someone picks up on what you’re doing, it’s back to step one: “Whoah, I thought we were just having a conversation. I know I’m not going to change your beliefs and you’re not going to change mine, so why don’t we move past this?”

Basically, I think that we need a new set of dirtbag tactics that rely less on edgy comedy and more on Machiavellianism. Never talk to these people in good faith, but always keep up the appearance. Earn their trust. Once they come to you with questions, then you can start a more honest dialogue.

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

How does one not take the bait, especially when the bait is very annoying? How do I learn this self control?

permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points

You think how much you would annoy them by appearing just nice human bean, with a plus of being nice human bean

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

:bean:

permalink
report
parent
reply

askchapo

!askchapo@hexbear.net

Create post

Ask Hexbear is the place to ask and answer thought-provoking questions.

Rules:

  1. Posts must ask a question.

  2. If the question asked is serious, answer seriously.

  3. Questions where you want to learn more about socialism are allowed, but questions in bad faith are not.

  4. Try !feedback@hexbear.net if you’re having questions about regarding moderation, site policy, the site itself, development, volunteering or the mod team.

Community stats

  • 125

    Monthly active users

  • 7.3K

    Posts

  • 164K

    Comments