One boomer was remarking about the rabbits and squirrels in their yard. The rabbits are there because we no longer have foxes because the boomers poison their yards. The squirrels are a food source for our at-risk birds of prey, while their ecological role spreading plant seeds adds to biodiversity and landscape regeneration in important ways. She called them “vile little creatures” and wished there was a way to kill them all.

The other’s yard was 90% dedicated to Kentucky bluegrass. Purely ornamental, green concrete that’s too poisonous for the rabbits to eat despite their effort. When I arrived she was pulling clover out of the only garden bed. When I left an hour later, she was still pulling cover out and asked if I could spray the bed with glyphosate to kill them. I said she might want to keep that species because it’s important for pollinators and adds to the health of the soil for her other flowers. She opted for a $150 glyphosate treatment which makes the ground carcinogenic and takes two weeks to work.

I fucking hate these people. I hate their settler-colonialism toward nature, their sociopathic need for domination, and their utter tastelessness once they’ve achieved that domination at the expense of every other species that once lived in that yard. In this desert these deranged freaks will spend thousands of dollars per year to preserve their lawns. The violence behind their bullshit community fetish is only ignored because their neighbours are worse.

You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments
41 points

If you LOVE your LAWN then you will REPLACE that INVASIVE grass with BEAUTIFUL and NATURAL species of PLANTS

permalink
report
reply
27 points

But I have a desperate attachment to my grass with three separate diseases on top of multiple other environmental issues I can’t fix but can be charged hundreds of dollars yearly to maintain. Those plants might feed a pollinator for free.

permalink
report
parent
reply

maybe try and trick them into thinking that the native grass is really fashionable

permalink
report
parent
reply
15 points

Then it would need less water and wouldn’t get all those diseases. My boss only gets to drive a sports car if the turf is diseased.

permalink
report
parent
reply

grasslands are also natural though. Just not the monoculture curated ones known as “lawns”

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

Or you can be like some people I know and replace it with litter astroturf to save water :bern-disgust:

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

yummy microplastics!!!

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

I tried to tell them about that and how it was literally litter with a different physical form and their boomer brains just shut me out with

“Yes but we really just want to see some green out there”

:grillman:

Like that’s where their mind went: they had destroyed the natural world, so they sought to replace it with a facsimile which would destroy it further

:guts-rage:

permalink
report
parent
reply

Earth

!earth@hexbear.net

Create post

The world’s #1 planet!

A community for the discussion of the environment, climate change, ecology, sustainability, nature, and pictures of cute wild animals.

Socialism is the only path out of the global ecological crisis.

Community stats

  • 5

    Monthly active users

  • 2.1K

    Posts

  • 33K

    Comments