Permanently Deleted

You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments
3 points

If one examines subcapitalist discourse, one is faced with a choice: either reject cultural nihilism or conclude that sexual identity has significance, but only if truth is interchangeable with consciousness; if that is not the case, the establishment is capable of intentionality. But the subject is contextualised into a modern Marxism that includes consciousness as a reality. The premise of cultural subcapitalist theory implies that sexual identity has significance. "Sexual identity is fundamentally responsible for sexist perceptions of narrativity,” says Baudrillard; however, according to Wilson, it is not so much sexual identity that is fundamentally responsible for sexist perceptions of narrativity, but rather the economy, and hence the fatal flaw, of sexual identity. Dialectic postcapitalist theory states that the significance of the artist is social comment. In a sense, Debord suggests the use of presemioticist patriarchialism to analyse society. D’Erlette states that we have to choose between Debordist image and Lacanist obscurity.

permalink
report
reply

chat

!chat@hexbear.net

Create post

Chat is a text only community for casual conversation, please keep shitposting to the absolute minimum. This is intended to be a separate space from c/chapotraphouse or the daily megathread. Chat does this by being a long-form community where topics will remain from day to day unlike the megathread, and it is distinct from c/chapotraphouse in that we ask you to engage in this community in a genuine way. Please keep shitposting, bits, and irony to a minimum.

As with all communities posts need to abide by the code of conduct, additionally moderators will remove any posts or comments deemed to be inappropriate.

Thank you and happy chatting!

Community stats

  • 149

    Monthly active users

  • 3.6K

    Posts

  • 62K

    Comments