Most of the time when people cite it, leftists just bring up the fact that he’s a religious extremist for the Victims of Communism who believes God gave him the mission of destroying China. Which isn’t wrong, but the obvious response there is that it doesn’t mean the information he gives is wrong.
Is there a good debunking of the actual paper and its claims, preferably from someone who actually can read Mandarin and Uyghur to say what the actual sources say?
I see so many users spell it wrong, did it used to be spelled that way or are people just :anglo-burn: brits/commonwealthers
idk i’m actually kind of comfortable with this gray zone of spelling conventions