Sure but their CEO controls mass amounts of capital.
Yeah the DSA probably doesn’t have great foreign policy, but it’s one of the best places in the US to find politically active individuals who are going to be more open to leftward leaning ideologies.
This mentality is inherently liberal. You’re putting the superstructure ahead of the base by assuming that people will become revolutionary by pure ideology alone rather than their material and class interests. Honestly it seems to me like most “leftists” would just rather talk to college educated peers than poor black and brown folks who make up the actual Proletariat in this country.
First off, thank you for the compliment.
I think people can be radicalized by ideology or material conditions, mostly a combination thereof.
“Honestly it seems to me like most “leftists” would just rather talk to college educated peers than poor black and brown folks who make up the actual Proletariat in this country.”
^I don’t see what this has to do with my opinion that the DSA could help move people down a path of radicalization. Seems pretty ad hominem at that, you don’t know anything about me dude.
I think people can be radicalized by ideology or material conditions, mostly a combination thereof.
Yes, this is the divide between the intelligentsia consciousness & the proletariat consciousness in communist parties.
Revolutions do not succeed when led by the intelligentsia, because they are not materially driven.
Sorry man, I don’t really get your point then in context to what I was trying to tell the original comment I replied to.
The point is that it’s worth considering how the class composition affects the DSA as an organization