I got a friend who honestly believes things like “Putin is crazy because he wasn’t showed any love as a kid.” Aside from the fact that my friend believes the whole “PUTIN IS CRAZY” meme, the friend also mentioned that Hitler wasn’t shown any love either…

Anyone have any resources that debunk this nonsense?

EDIT: I found this: https://www.thesurvivorstrust.org/FAQs/if-someone-is-sexually-abused-during-their-childhood-they-are-likely-to-become-an-abuser-themselves (“The vast majority of child abuse survivors will never perpetrate sexual abuse and are utterly appalled by the insinuation that they are capable of such an act”)

EDIT 2: Also found this study: https://www.ojp.gov/ncjrs/virtual-library/abstracts/do-abused-children-become-abusive-parents:

Annotation

The belief that abused children are likely to become abusive parents is widely accepted, but the authors contend that this belief cannot be unconditionally supported.

Abstract

A review of case history, agency record, and self-report studies indicates that about one-third of all individuals who were physically abused, sexually abused, or extremely neglected will subject their children to one of these forms of maltreatment. The rate of abuse among individuals with a history of abuse is approximately six times higher than the base rate for abuse in the general population. Although this suggests that being maltreated as a child is an important risk factor in the etiology of abuse, most maltreated children do not become abusive parents. Many mediating factors affect the likelihood of intergenerational abuse. Consequently, unqualified acceptance of the intergenerational hypothesis is unwarranted.

You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments
7 points

Yeah I mean that’s true. Using it to defend the abuses of the most powerful people on Earth is pretty sus though.

Thinking about this through the lens specific traumatic abuses isn’t necessarily super helpful though. What is more true is that people are the way they are because of the experiences they had that molded them to be certain ways, and if you had the same inputs you’d be doing the same thing.

permalink
report
reply

Yeah I mean that’s true.

Is it thought? I’ve seen it referred to as a harmful myth.

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

Yeah well it’s not 1-to-1, that’s why I offered the more true version in my comment

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

It’s not.

Twin studies more or less debunk this for you.

Kids are not moldable clay and it peeves me to hear it.

permalink
report
parent
reply

Twin studies more or less debunk this for you.

I’ve seen good criticisms of twin studies and how they’re not that reliable:

https://slate.com/human-interest/2011/08/the-methodological-confusion-of-twin-studies.html

https://www.madinamerica.com/2022/05/debunking-minnesota-study-twins-reared-apart/

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply

politics

!politics@hexbear.net

Create post

Protests, dual power, and even electoralism.

Labour and union posts go to !labour@www.hexbear.net.

Take the dunks to /c/strugglesession or !the_dunk_tank@www.hexbear.net.

!chapotraphouse@www.hexbear.net is good for shitposting.

Do not post direct links to reactionary sites.

Off topic posts will be removed.

Follow the Hexbear Code of Conduct and remember we’re all comrades here.

Community stats

  • 107

    Monthly active users

  • 14K

    Posts

  • 127K

    Comments