Not in a great spot. My material needs are met, so don’t worry about that. Just want to break out of the cycle I’m in of “oh hey, you have only a few hundred from this paycheck before you’re negative again.”
I absolutely understand why this wouldn’t be an “agree to disagree” sort of thing for you, but I’m not having this argument right now. I’ll read and consider the links you shared, though.
If I saw someone’s actions as tantamount to genocide then I wouldn’t simply agree to disagree. That’s what I understand and that’s why I’m not asking her to hear me out.
Not good enough. You clearly don’t view the animal holocaust as genocide. You don’t have the right to simply disengage when the facts don’t suit your material interests. Your actions have real-life harmful consequences on the lived experience of subjective, animal people.
Three questions:
- How do you define sentience?
- What is the base value of humans?
- What do you call systemic killing?
I’ll give you the answers now to save time:
- capability of feeling
- capability of feeling. Therefore, you should extend the base value of humans to other animals, who are also capable of feeling.
- genocide