You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments
46 points
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
reply
22 points

Churchill and Roosevelt balked for years as Stalin begged them to open a western front to vent some pressure from the ostfront. I know Churchill considered it a win-win if the Nazi and Soviet menaces ground themselves down to nothing. Eventually, the weaker 2/3rds of the Allies tickled the Axis in Africa and Italy long before they landed at Normandy. It wasn’t until a year and a half after the Soviets won at Stalingrad and had already made it clear they were headed to Berlin that the Allies decided to get serious about liberating Western Europe.

permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points

The US wanted a '43 invasion of France, it was the British that stalled it so hard because they were petrified of losing their own men. I’d say you have an accurate assessment of Churchill and the British but the Americans definitely wanted to be more active on the Western Front, you have to remember until Truman the climate around Roosevelt and his cabinet was that of a post-war partnership and collaboration with the USSR.

(In case it comes off that way, this isn’t apologia for US imperialism or anything)

permalink
report
parent
reply

post-war partnership and collaboration with the USSR

:sicko-wistful:

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points

Exactly. The US understood the utility and need for a second front from day one. Eisenhower grew progressively pissed at the British for delaying

permalink
report
parent
reply
20 points
*

Capitalists use fascists as their attack dogs, and sometimes they go rabid.

permalink
report
parent
reply