Permanently Deleted

You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments

Because despite having better opinions 95% of communists still hold to liberal ways of thinking or liberal research statistics.

Nuclear was viable as a stopgap when solar and wind tech wasn’t there yet. But there’s no real reason to invest in it today as a main source of energy. If you say that then you’ll inevitable get the “solar and wind isn’t enough to supply energy” quote from Exxon Mobile and other fossil fuel researchers. They’re aren’t being deliberately reactionary, they just haven’t re-examined their beliefs that far yet.

It’s like how you had to re-learn that the American revolution wasn’t actually about freedom and democracy. Just a remnant of lib brain worms that persist after the core has been removed.

permalink
report
reply
21 points

Gonna need the non liberal stats showing that solar and wind is enough.

permalink
report
parent
reply

Here’s an entire scientific article on it

The fact that Exxon mobile tier anti-renewable propaganda “renewable isn’t enough” is accepted without a source proves my point. Brainworms on full display.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply

askchapo

!askchapo@hexbear.net

Create post

Ask Hexbear is the place to ask and answer thought-provoking questions.

Rules:

  1. Posts must ask a question.

  2. If the question asked is serious, answer seriously.

  3. Questions where you want to learn more about socialism are allowed, but questions in bad faith are not.

  4. Try !feedback@hexbear.net if you’re having questions about regarding moderation, site policy, the site itself, development, volunteering or the mod team.

Community stats

  • 125

    Monthly active users

  • 7.3K

    Posts

  • 164K

    Comments