Michael Hudson makes the point that’s it not even just capitalism that economics departments don’t question anymore, but also specifically neoliberal economics. All the old timers like Adam smith, Ricardo, etc we’re concerned about keeping markets free from domination by rentier interests so that they’d be more productive. But they apparently got around that by just scrapping any study of the history of economic thought in Econ departments altogether. The term “Free market” has essentially been retconned to mean free FOR rentier exploitation, rather than free FROM it.
11 points
chapotraphouse
!chapotraphouse@hexbear.net
Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.
No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer
Gossip posts go in c/gossip. Don’t post low-hanging fruit here after it gets removed from c/gossip
Community stats
321
Monthly active users
46K
Posts
530K
Comments
Community moderators
- LENINSGHOSTFACEKILLA [he/him]@hexbear.net
- MiraculousMM [he/him, any]@hexbear.net
- KenBonesWildRide [they/them]@hexbear.net
- Nakoichi [they/them]@hexbear.net
- itsPina [he/him, she/her]@hexbear.net
- corgiwithalaptop [any, love/loves]@hexbear.net
- PorkrollPosadist [he/him, they/them]@hexbear.net
- ZoomeristLeninist [comrade/them, she/her]@hexbear.net
- EmmaGoldman [she/her, comrade/them]@hexbear.net
- InsidiousTrackers@hexbear.netB
- sweet_pecan [love/loves, they/them]@hexbear.net
- a_little_red_rat [he/him, comrade/them]@hexbear.net