There’s always something distinctly goofy about people using “trans” as a singular.

As far as OP’s argument goes, the philosophical foundation outlined in the “Simple explanation” section is dumb prima facie because the idea of nature falling into sets of two diametrically opposed forces that cannot intermingle is itself dumb; it doesn’t take a seasoned photographer or a lifelong painter to tell you there’s a lot more to light (and the absence thereof) than just “light” or “dark”. How on earth are genders supposed to complete each other if they’re that opposed, anyhow? Wouldn’t a separationist stance make more sense?

Likewise, the insinuation that the loss of identity is inherently a bad thing is absurd, as is the insinuation that a strong sense thereof is always good. Identities are just another abstract in a world full to the brim with abstracts. You can do with or without 'em.

For the hell of it, the insinuation that being a “sissy bitch” is inherently a bad thing is subjective. Attractiveness is a matter of taste, and I will die a thousand deaths before I relinquish my twinks.

Oh yeah, one last thing - I mean freedom and equality for me. The system’s a cudgel, and no matter what your big cause is we all want to wield it against our foes at some point or another. That fact is a elephant in the room i’m quite fine laying out straight.