This is bad. The state board is full of the worst conservative ghouls imaginable, the very same people who rewrote history textbooks to say workers instead of slaves. Houston ISD has over 200,000 students.
Charter schools are funded through state-wide taxes, whereas public schools are typically funded by local property taxes from people living/working in school districts. Charter schools end up slashing property taxes and help facilitate growth of suburbs filled with McMansions. That’s why. Less taxes for hog boat dealership owners.
I assume the curriculum changes too maybe? I don’t know how the US education system works, but there is this age old dispute over wether kids should maybe see a painting at school sometimes and wether they should be taught to be walmart greeters from birth to high school graduation (age 12, working age).
Charter schools are regarded as “experimental” and aren’t subject to the same legal oversight as public schools. I don’t know if these things exist elsewhere, but I hope not.
They’re run for profit and aren’t administered by any government, they’re operated by interest groups who have a contract with the state. They’re effectively what @MaoistLandlord called them, private schools funded with tax money.
They’re also highly inefficient. Kids going to charter schools are usually getting a much worse education than even the worst public schools. I remember there was some kind of study on charter schools in Alabama saying something like for every 100 days of education a public student would get, an equivalent charter student was getting 0.
They’re run for profit and aren’t administered by any government, they’re operated by interest groups who have a contract with the state. They’re effectively what @MaoistLandlord called them, private schools funded with tax money.
there are public charter schools administered by local school districts but none of this debate is about them.
