You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments View context
14 points
*

Life is a state of low entropy that perpetuates itself through time. DNA is just a part of the overall mechanism.

Think of it like a parts manual in the glove-box of a car. To say the car exists to move the manual from place to place would be an absurd summary of the car. Take the manual out, and throw it into deep space – it’s now meaningless. It only works in the context of an industry that builds cars, of workers who can read and understand the text. You couldn’t build a car from just the manual. Similarly, you couldn’t recreate a creature from just its DNA. The chromosome is meaningless without the context of the cell.

permalink
report
parent
reply

Think of it like a parts manual in the glove-box of a car. To say the car exists to move the manual from place to place would be an absurd summary of the car.

What do you think a virus is buddy? It’s literally just genetic material propagating itself without the need for a body. Your car analogy doesn’t stand. Scientists don’t even consider viruses to be alive in the traditional sense but they still spread regardless. You and I are just a different way to spread that same demonic molecule. You are a flesh puppet for a entity that isn’t even intelligent enough to be considered alive. It goes on “living” but you and I die; the game was rigged from the start.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply

This isn’t a question of semantic language, it’s an attempt to overturn the popular idea that “My DNA is myself.”

You are not DNA, you are a by-product to ensure the survival and propagation of your DNA. If DNA could spread more efficiently without you, it would do so. The only difference between a virus, essentially just rogue DNA/RNA, and a human being is a question of strategy. You and your DNA are separate entities.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points
*

The analogy works fine. A virus cannot propagate in a vacuum, it does need a body. Specifically the body of a compatible cell.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

Wait are you trying to suggest that instead of having an idealist quality things have dialectical natures?

permalink
report
parent
reply

Imagine acknowledging that DNA has the same relationship to a human as a virus does to a cell and then thinking that’s a good thing.

What does it mean when the body is entirely secondary to the propagation of a molecule? A virus destroys the cell without regard because it’s only “goal” is to spread itself regardless of whether or not its beneficial to the cell. The only difference between a virus and your DNA is a question of strategy.

permalink
report
parent
reply

You couldn’t build a car from just the manual. Similarly, you couldn’t recreate a creature from just its DNA. The chromosome is meaningless without the context of the cell.

What do you think a virus is buddy? It’s literally just genetic material propagating itself without the need for a body. Scientists don’t even consider viruses to be alive in the traditional sense but they still spread regardless. You and I are just a different way to spread that same demonic molecule. You are a flesh puppet for a entity that isn’t even intelligent enough to be considered alive. It goes on “living” but you and I die; the game was rigged from the start.

permalink
report
parent
reply