I’ve seen some very heated debates by leftists on both sides of the argument that have left me very confused.

You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments View context
5 points

Yeah, that’s valid.

Since you brought up the proletariat in general, do you think there should be terminology that is similarly evocative and effecting for all coerced labor under capitalism as we have for coerced sex (ie rape)? Or is there something inherent in sexual labor that separates it from other coercive forms of labor?

permalink
report
parent
reply

do you think there should be terminology that is similarly evocative and effecting for all coerced labor under capitalism

Don’t we have that? I think “wage slavery” pretty well covers that base

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points
*

Good question, I haven’t thought about it… A kneejerk thought (I stress that) would be that a lot labour we do isn’t tied to significantly degrading the mind, body (and spirit?). Whereas sex itself is layered inside lots of unique issues, christianity’s influence on it as a special act, and so on and so forth probably plays a role here in the way anything other than treating it as special is viewed as degrading or damaging to the mind, body and soul of a person.

I really want to stress that this is a kneejerk initial thought as I have not thought about this particular difference very heavily. After letting it stew for some time I might come to different ideas about it.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Both you and @GonzoBonzo raise interesting points that I do not fully understand. But it’s given me the following thought:

Labor under capitalism is about producing a commodity. This includes stuff like Amazon workers and also OF models (producing a video-commodity for example). The capitalist buys the labor power of the worker for the sake of producing something to sell.

But direct sexual labor is not about commodity production, and what is being bought is another person’s body + performance.

Performance itself is a type of commodity under capitalism - see singers at a stage, even strippers.

But maybe the aspect of the body being necessary is enough to differentiate direct sexual labor from all else, and serve to distinguish it from sex work (producing a sexual commodity/performance).

I don’t know if this will stand up to scrutiny. I’m also just trying to figure things out. None of us want to harm sex workers and, imo, if some people want to do that under capitalism, and even prefer it to other forms of labor, then we shouldn’t take steps to make it harder? But if it is rape, then shouldn’t we eliminate it and not allow more people to subject themselves to it, even willingly?

It’s confusing.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

But if it is rape, then shouldn’t we eliminate it and not allow more people to subject themselves to it, even willingly?

Not without a substitute that guarantees their survival.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
5 points
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply

askchapo

!askchapo@hexbear.net

Create post

Ask Hexbear is the place to ask and answer thought-provoking questions.

Rules:

  1. Posts must ask a question.

  2. If the question asked is serious, answer seriously.

  3. Questions where you want to learn more about socialism are allowed, but questions in bad faith are not.

  4. Try !feedback@hexbear.net if you’re having questions about regarding moderation, site policy, the site itself, development, volunteering or the mod team.

Community stats

  • 125

    Monthly active users

  • 7.3K

    Posts

  • 164K

    Comments