Hunter gatherers mostly gathered, we agree, and ate far less meat than modern westerners. It is still true that they at far more more meat than post-agricultural humans, which aren’t a group that was a good model for diet.
I agree that meat consumption isn’t necessary, and certainly not in quantity, but you will need additional supplementation. Without supplementation, a vegan diet is very difficult to make healthy. Your argument implied that wasn’t true, which I took issue with.
As far as the increasing meat consumption in India and China, we both know that’s not because they’re convinced it’s necessary for health, it’s because people eat more meat as they get richer. Promoting alternatives is an active measure that their governments must take, and that will be unpopular to some degree.
but you will need additional supplementation
i haven’t taken a supplement since 2012 because i can’t afford them
i just eat food that has the nutrients i need
Modern Western diet is so disastrous for health (and environment) but no one points that out when saying “a vegan diet is very difficult to make healthy. “
No, rice and beans, staple of billions of people for thousands of years, is less healthy than the current diet most westerners follow, apparently.
The staple diet between the agricultural and industrial revolution is not much healthier, if at all compared to the current western diet. You’re making a reactionary argument that we did it in the past, therefore it is good.
The majority of people living in post-agricultural civilizations suffered some form of malnutrition. It was adequate in terms of calories, but micronutrient deficiency was very widespread.
rice is weirdly expensive where i live, at least in bulk
so i just eat things that are cheap here most of the time
like carrots, peppers, pasta, tomatoes, so many beans, etc
