my contempt is for what you are saying now, not whatever it was that you said before.

\n","replacements":[],"localSiteName":"Hexbear"}} 3a:{"commentView":"$3b","children":"$41","parent":"$42","markdown":{"html":"","replacements":[],"localSiteName":"Hexbear"}} 32:{"commentView":"$33","children":"$39","parent":"$3a","markdown":{"html":"

I am saying that you are being uncritical of the reporting as though all the past bullshit reports taught you nothing. Yes, if HRW was known to be giving us the best representation of what happened, that would reflect a very serious problem. We do not know that they are.

\n","replacements":[],"localSiteName":"Hexbear"}} 22:{"commentView":"$23","children":"$29","parent":"$32","markdown":{"html":"","replacements":[],"localSiteName":"Hexbear"}} 5b:[] 5a:{"html":"

I haven’t even read the whole thing yet. What I am saying is that we shouldn’t simply accept its characterizations uncritically. Is media criticism such a wild idea?

\n","replacements":"$5b","localSiteName":"Hexbear"} 5d:[] 5c:{"html":"","replacements":"$5d","localSiteName":"Hexbear"} 5f:[] 5e:{"html":"

\n","replacements":"$5f","localSiteName":"Hexbear"} 61:[] 60:{"html":"","replacements":"$61","localSiteName":"Hexbear"} 63:[] 62:{"html":"

You remember that interaction better than I do.

Don’t worry, even if I never saw the username I would have responded the same way, because my contempt is for what you are saying now, not whatever it was that you said before.

\n","replacements":"$63","localSiteName":"Hexbear"} 65:[] 64:{"html":"","replacements":"$65","localSiteName":"Hexbear"} 67:[] 66:{"html":"

You’ll notice I don’t remember the com

Community stats

Community moderators