This isn’t a moral argument. It’s a tactical one.

If you are a white vegan arguing with a carnist and that carnist brings up indigenous meat eating to associate veganism with colonialism, you may appear to be in a double bind. It is extremely difficult if not impossible to go on the attack without associating the vegan movement with colonialism and thus damaging it. But if you back down without fighting, then the carnist’s point goes unchallenged, strengthening their position and weakening that of veganism.

That doesn’t mean you don’t have options, though. Think of the carnist’s argument as a heavily fortified military strongpoint. You don’t attack such a position head-on. You infiltrate. You hit it from its blind spots. You attack the weaker flanks and encircle it.

Instead of attacking indigenous people who eat meat, point out how cattle ranchers drove bison to the verge of extinction to force Native Americans to become dependent on their product. Talk about how commercial overfishing threatens the food supplies of coastal indigenous communities. Ask them about the vast portions of the Amazon being cleared for cattle grazing. Remind them of the exploited immigrants getting PTSD from their work in slaughterhouses. In short, confront them with the fact that carnism does far more to harm indigenous communities than veganism ever has or (owing to carnists having vastly more political power than we do) presently could.

All of this, of course, assumes that the person you’re talking to is not indigenous. If they are indigenous, there’s a good chance they’ll already be sympathetic to some of your views. In fact, indigenous communities have actually been at the forefront of fighting some of the worst excesses of western carnism, such as when the Inuit got Canada and four other countries to ban commercial fishing in the Arctic. It’s important to recognize that they’re probably closer to our position than an average westerner, and that they’re doing meaningful work to advance goals that align with our movement. No, most indigenous cultures aren’t 100% vegan as we define the concept, but as Lenin said, you can’t make a revolution in white gloves.

You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments

Nah. Meat eating is immoral no matter what. If some Amazonian tribe regularly sacrified people to their God, they wouldn’t be morally absolved even if it’s a part of their culture. Fuck off carnist apologist.

permalink
report
reply

Maybe read the whole post and don’t just react to the title lol

permalink
report
parent
reply

vegan

!vegan@hexbear.net

Create post

:vegan-liberation:

Welcome to /c/vegan and congratulations on your first steps toward overcoming liberalism and ascending to true leftist moral superiority.

Rules

  • No plant-based diet bullshit or promotion of plant-based capitalism. Veganism isn’t about you, it’s about historical materialist anti-speciesism, anti-racist animalization, and animal liberation. Ethical vegans only.
  • No omni apologists or carnists. Babystepping is for libs, and we’re not here to pat you on the back. Good faith questions and debate about how to fight for animal liberation are allowed.
  • No advocating violence to any species for any reason. If you think this is negotiable GTFO. This includes but is not limited to animal testing, slaughter, and mass euthanasia. Anything that promotes speciesism or the commodification of animals will be removed.
  • Use Content Warnings and NSFW tags for triggering content. Especially if a comrade requests it.
  • Questions about diet belong in c/food. It’s also a great place to share recipes.
  • In all sections of the site, you must follow the Hexbear.net Code of Conduct.

Resources

Animal liberation and direct action

Read theory, libs

Vegan 101 & FAQs

If you have any great resources or theory you think belong in this sidebar, please message one of the comm's mods

Take B12. :vegan-edge:

Community stats

  • 3

    Monthly active users

  • 877

    Posts

  • 8.7K

    Comments