https://www.businessinsider.com/elon-musk-laid-off-twitter-workers-value-tech-jobs-work-2023-5

Discourse has recently raged over the apparent trend of “fake work,” with some execs and investors claiming that tech companies overhired and gave people unnecessary jobs as a “vanity metric.” Proponents of the theory say that this is why tech giants are now slashing so many jobs.

You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments
19 points

Yeah, the rationale was “hire every talent you can get, you’ll need them someday. If not, at least you’re starving the competition of good people by hoarding them.” This resulted in the infamous “adult daycare center” video where the lady brags about how great her day is at Twitter and shows off all the amenities like yoga classes, espresso machine in the employee lounge, the rooftop wine bar, etc. It got all these chuds to scream “but you didn’t do any actual work!” It was a wonderful moment. Well, at least before Elon took over and burned the place down.

permalink
report
reply

Elon Musk grossly over-estimated how much people would be willing to work at a company that’s not about electric cars, scifi space travel, or honestly anything interesting despite terrible working conditions.

permalink
report
parent
reply

It got all these chuds to scream “but you didn’t do any actual work!”

at a certain point you just have to either come to terms with the fact that market economies run your life by making arbitrary and dumbass decisions or go mad

like yeah they get rewarded for no actual work because this isn’t a meritocracy

permalink
report
parent
reply
18 points

A small group got to experience FALGSC for a moment.

permalink
report
parent
reply

Except the automation was the rest of the proletariat

permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply

I’m not sure if I should support this because it lets workers shake the money tree at the expense of a large corporation, or opposite it because it lets the tech sector exaggerate its own economic importance (which has no doubt had negative effects on various municipal planning decisions made in the bay area over the last few decades.)

permalink
report
parent
reply

I vote to opposite it because it creates really fucked up liberal consciousness among tech workers and the money tree is totally willing to shell out for that.

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points
*

it was bad. it created a labor aristocracy who didn’t understand their class interests; the whole project was based on making the Internet terrible with ads/casino psychology and exploiting more precarious workers, ruining whole categories of existing jobs; and every city that used to be worth living in was devastated by the influx of money into this useless group of workers. like this is a big part of why the rent is so damn high.

permalink
report
parent
reply