I think it makes some points. Does anyone more knowledgeable on this subject have a different take?

You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments View context
5 points

Poverty is defined as lacking basic needs, and while Mao-era China was still relatively underdeveloped, the people were not poor because they got basic needs met.

I’m glad to see I’m not the only one here who is suspicious of the metrics used to prop up the 800 million lifted out of poverty narrative. IIRC the data used to justify the claim is a World Bank report that shows the population making over a certain threshold of income increasing. As you touched on, this data says nothing as to whether or not their needs are actually met.

permalink
report
parent
reply

Leftist Infighting: A community dedicated to allowing leftists to vent their frustrations

!leftistinfighting@lemmygrad.ml

Create post

The purpose of this community is sort of a “work out your frustrations by letting it all out” where different leftist tendencies can vent their frustrations with one another and more assertively and directly challenge one another. Hostility is allowed, but any racist, fascist, or reactionary crap wont be tolerated, nor will explicit threats.

Community stats

  • 1

    Monthly active users

  • 76

    Posts

  • 1.1K

    Comments

Community moderators