cross-posted from: https://lemmy.crimedad.work/post/12162

Why? Because apparently they need some more incentive to keep units occupied. Also, even though a property might be vacant, there’s still imputed rental income there. Its owner is just receiving it in the form of enjoying the unit for himself instead of receiving an actual rent check from a tenant. That imputed rent ought to be taxed like any other income.

You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments View context

Housing can get built without the professional middlemen involved, believe it or not.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply

People, collectively.

Ideally all the shitheads obsessed with “owning” get removed from the equation

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points
Removed by mod
permalink
report
parent
reply
40 points
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
38 points

Heres one of the largest housing developments in new york: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Co-op_City,_Bronx

permalink
report
parent
reply
35 points

Let’s start with pretty much the entirety of millenials and gen z that would love to own a home.

I mean, then there’s the homeless.

permalink
report
parent
reply

Not landlords, because we’re imagining a different society than the single model in your aphantasia afflicted head, believe it or not

permalink
report
parent
reply
13 points

The people living in them usually.

permalink
report
parent
reply

Personal Finance

!personalfinance@lemmy.ml

Create post

Learn about budgeting, saving, getting out of debt, credit, investing, and retirement planning. Join our community, read the PF Wiki, and get on top of your finances!

Note: This community is not region centric, so if you are posting anything specific to a certain region, kindly specify that in the title (something like [USA], [EU], [AUS] etc.)

Community stats

  • 1

    Monthly active users

  • 83

    Posts

  • 519

    Comments