The use of depleted uranium munitions has been fiercely debated, with opponents like the International Coalition to Ban Uranium Weapons saying there are dangerous health risks from ingesting or inhaling depleted uranium dust, including cancers and birth defects.

You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments
84 points

Every person involved in making this decision deserves to be buried in an unmarked grave with the weapons they love so much. How many innocent people completely uninvolved with the war are going to grow up suffering the effects of depleted uranium rounds? Another absolutely monstrous decision in a long line of monstrous decisions by the US government.

permalink
report
reply
26 points

Yes, we get it, the response to literally every decision you don’t like is massacre of the people you don’t like

permalink
report
parent
reply
75 points

Are you aware of what depleted uranium does to the human body? Innocent people are going to be dealing with the consequences of a decision made by a handful of people across the planet for decades after the war ends. Does poisoning generations of people sound like “defending” Ukrainians to you?

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

But Depleted uranium isn’t enriched uranium.

You’re lying.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points
  1. Yes, I’m aware of the effects of depleted uranium on the human body; are you? 2) What would you propose to help Ukraine evict the genocidal invaders from its territory?
permalink
report
parent
reply

Seeing one thing Hm, this is like every thing

-The Eternal Lib

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

It’s almost like I’ve seen this same redfash response multiple times 🤔

permalink
report
parent
reply

What do you think should be done with war profiteers that destroy societies for money?

permalink
report
parent
reply
12 points
*

They aren’t that dangerous as a weapon of war. The uranium is depleted, as the name suggest. The alternative is heavy metal, which is also dangerous to breathe in. It’s war and it sucks for health. Maybe there shouldn’t have been an invasion…

permalink
report
parent
reply
74 points

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7903104/ this shit is still causing birth defects in Iraq. This is Ukraine’s future now.

permalink
report
parent
reply
4 points

And so do other heavy metals. What do you suggest they use that won’t have negative health impacts (which is ironic for something designed to kill, but whatever)?

permalink
report
parent
reply
58 points
4 points

Any heavy metal causes similar issues. Heavy metal will be used, whether it’s uranium or something else. Should they just stop shooting?

permalink
report
parent
reply

Uranium is a very dangerous heavy metal, it just isn’t radioactive.

permalink
report
parent
reply

Depleted Uranium is definitely radioactive. It’s depleted but there are still radioactive isotopes in it. It’s relatively same to handle until it’s fired and some of it turns to dust. The dust is both poisonous and radioactive. The toxicity of it is probably worse than the radiation but they’re both still bad.

permalink
report
parent
reply
23 points

Nowhere did I make the claim that it was, that doesn’t change a thing

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

Ah, yes, a nice hexbear to giggle at on my Sunday evening.

permalink
report
parent
reply
51 points

permalink
report
parent
reply
42 points
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply
23 points

🌽 🌽 🌽

permalink
report
parent
reply
18 points

Post your hog

permalink
report
parent
reply

World News

!worldnews@lemmy.ml

Create post

News from around the world!

Rules:

  • Please only post links to actual news sources, no tabloid sites, etc

  • No NSFW content

  • No hate speech, bigotry, propaganda, etc

Community stats

  • 37

    Monthly active users

  • 6.9K

    Posts

  • 27K

    Comments