You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments 3 points
ah yes, slavers and exploiters.
“peasants with a couple of cows or five or six acres [~2 ha] more than their neighbors” were labeled kulaks.
Not to mention the famine that followed this act of genius.
3 points
Because they had slightly more land than their neighbors? Or a business?
Cool, cool.
Because they intentionally destroyed resources to fight collectivization (ie throwing a tantrum to avoid having to share with people with less than them), which while the process was admittedly mishandled ended up being a good thing in the long run.
Also I’m not just going to believe a Wikipedia article that anyone with even slightly more than others was labled a Kulak anyway.
