You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments View context

I shall crawl further and further into my echo chamber until I will have finally achieved socialism all by myself

Social-democracy is capitalism. Social-democrats are not socialists

Lenin/Stalin/Mao and Castro did not go “we need to work with capitalists” lol. They conquered them and in some instances shot them.

:ak47: :ak47: :ak47: :mao-aggro-shining: :stalin-shining:

permalink
report
parent
reply

Lenin p worked with capitalists, liberals and the bourgeoisie. Only in the process of layer stages of 1917 (not 1905!) would he switch to taking power directly, without a liberal revolution. Which made him deviate from orthodox Marxism and implement more central power.

permalink
report
parent
reply
9 points

Lenin started the NEP and Deng went right back to capitalism.

permalink
report
parent
reply

To build up industry did Lenin work with capitalists? Or was the communist party in control of the industry and the economy?

Dengs a revisionist so not sure what your point is

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

Both Mao and Stalin absolutely and concretely did advocate working with the “progressive” bourgeoisie as part of the whole two-stage theory error.

permalink
report
parent
reply
8 points

Correct. Stalin never made deals with Fascists. He historically never invaded Poland alongside Hitler in 1939

permalink
report
parent
reply
6 points
*
Deleted by creator
permalink
report
parent
reply

I mean Mao worked with the “Nationalist Bourgeoise” or whatever right? Granted they were subordinate to the party and the circumstances in feudal china and capitalist usa are different.

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points
*

China was not an imperialist country though

In fact the exact opposite - they were a colonial country held in shackles by the imperial powers /Japan/uk/France and USA

So China was a communist revolution and a national liberation struggle against capitalist imperialism described in Lenins Right Of Nations To Self Determination

The equivalent item (if we’re trying to find one) is the Communist Party of China working with Uncle Tom Chinese that collaborated with the foreigners

They didn’t…they shot them

permalink
report
parent
reply

I know, I am just being nitpicky. I’m not suggesting the situations are comparable.

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

You’re absolutely right. Stalin would never ally with capitalists like Churchill, and Mao would never consider forming a United Front with a capitalist like Chang Kai-shek. The history understander has logged on.

permalink
report
parent
reply

Yes thats absolutely comparable

Having conquered political power in their own countries and made concessions against super powers in foreign policy is the same as lining up behind a succdem in the imperial core

permalink
report
parent
reply
3 points

Having conquered political power in their own countries

Do you know anything about Chinese history? Like, at all?

is the same as lining up behind a succdem in the imperial core

It’s almost as if Stalin and Mao didn’t live in the imperial core and aren’t perfect examples for operating within it.

permalink
report
parent
reply

politics

!politics@hexbear.net

Create post

Protests, dual power, and even electoralism.

Labour and union posts go to !labour@www.hexbear.net.

Take the dunks to /c/strugglesession or !the_dunk_tank@www.hexbear.net.

!chapotraphouse@www.hexbear.net is good for shitposting.

Do not post direct links to reactionary sites.

Off topic posts will be removed.

Follow the Hexbear Code of Conduct and remember we’re all comrades here.

Community stats

  • 107

    Monthly active users

  • 14K

    Posts

  • 127K

    Comments