You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments
0 points

Wonder if those were “professional” military or just unfortunate working class conscripts

permalink
report
reply
0 points
0 points

I might not be 100% correct but Germany didn’t use conscripts that early at war, so those are probably professional soldiers?

A number of Ukrainians I or my acquaintances have contacts with, didn’t want or believe there’s going to be a war and so did a lot of people around them, though obviously being bombed doesn’t make one particularly favorable of the side doing the bombing. This is different from Nazi Germany where Wehrmacht troops have been brainwashed to see Soviet and generally Slavic people like shit to extreme and were on the fucking settler conquest.

I’m not gonna cry over banderlog scum, but a lot of people there have voted for Zelenskyy over Poroshenko because he promised a ceasefire in Donbass and wasn’t generally a fucking Ukronationalist (and was “tough on corruption”). He then took a classic huge dump on those who elected him because he has west-oriented capital to serve.

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points
*

Germany started conscription in 1935, they conscripted averagely 300000 men each year up to war and more in the war. Hard to tell exact numbers of conscripts in 1941 but i imagine they did fought since Germany mobilised everything they could for Barbarossa.

The same is about Ukraine, we don’t really know how many conscripts exactly there are and where they are.

I know quite many Ukrainians in Poland, and i noticed in 2 big and one medium company from where i have info from, non went back to fight. Can’t blame them at all.

This is different from Nazi Germany where Wehrmacht troops have been brainwashed to see Soviet and generally Slavic people like shit to extreme and were on the fucking settler conquest.

This is exact same message banderites are putting about Russians and especially people from Donbass. Odessa massacre did happened for reason.

I’m not gonna cry over banderlog scum, but a lot of people there have voted for Zelenskyy over Poroshenko because he promised a ceasefire in Donbass and wasn’t generally a fucking Ukronationalist (and was “tough on corruption”). He then took a classic huge dump on those who elected him because he has west-oriented capital to serve.

Fair enough

My point was rather that i was not expecting this kind of dead horse question here.

permalink
report
parent
reply

GenZedong

!genzedong@lemmygrad.ml

Create post

This is a Dengist community in favor of Bashar al-Assad with no information that can lead to the arrest of Hillary Clinton, our fellow liberal and queen. This community is not ironic. We are Marxists-Leninists.

This community is for posts about Marxism and geopolitics (including shitposts to some extent). Serious posts can be posted here or in /c/GenZhou. Reactionary or ultra-leftist cringe posts belong in /c/shitreactionariessay or /c/shitultrassay respectively.

We have a Matrix homeserver and a Matrix space. See this thread for more information. If you believe the server may be down, check the status on status.elara.ws.

Rules:

  • No bigotry, anti-communism, pro-imperialism or ultra-leftism (anti-AES)
  • We support indigenous liberation as the primary contradiction in settler colonies like the US, Canada, Australia, New Zealand and Israel
  • If you post an archived link (excluding archive.org), include the URL of the original article as well
  • Unless it’s an obvious shitpost, include relevant sources
  • For articles behind paywalls, try to include the text in the post
  • Mark all posts containing NSFW images as NSFW (including things like Nazi imagery)

Community stats

  • 79

    Monthly active users

  • 3.6K

    Posts

  • 31K

    Comments