You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments View context
0 points

It offsets personal income by the difference between what the property costs and what it brings in for rent. We need an accountant to chime in here. If Ms. Jones invests money into her business to keep it going (since costs are outweighing income), is that money still income? Or would it be deductible as well?

Either way, that amount isn’t a going to be more than the rental income. And under either model the rent income isn’t taxed until the property is generating more rent than its outgoings. Once that happens, it’s time to buy the next property and go back into the red. It feels like s ponzi scheme, doesn’t it?

I see the problems. I just don’t know how to fix them.

permalink
report
parent
reply
0 points

You don’t seem to see the problem at all, the goal of removing negative gearing is to force people to sell, what that means to their personal finances is immaterial

permalink
report
parent
reply

Australia

!australia@aussie.zone

Create post

A place to discuss Australia and important Australian issues.

Topical Megathreads
Before you post:

If you’re posting anything related to:

If you’re posting Australian News (not opinion or discussion pieces) post it to Australian News

Rules

This community is run under the rules of aussie.zone.

Banner Photo

Congratulations to @Tau@aussie.zone who had the most upvoted submission to our banner photo competition

Recommended and Related Communities

Be sure to check out and subscribe to our related communities on aussie.zone:

Plus other communities for sport and major cities.

https://aussie.zone/communities

Community stats

  • 1

    Monthly active users

  • 411

    Posts

  • 1.9K

    Comments