You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments View context

If the infrastructure is publicly owned it won’t be seeking a profit or to please shareholders, only the Australian people, so prices will be lkw anyway. The it also has the possibility to be covered entirely by taxes (at least for some base level plan) since its now an essential service to the economy

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

Not necessarily. The passport office is publicly owned and we pay some of the highest fees for passports.

The nbn is publicly owned but seeks to make a profit.

Anything that is government owned is paid for by us all anyway, through taxes. That’s not necessarily a bad thing. But, when things are more expensive to use, but not used by all, it’s fairer. However for essential service, spreading the cost by how much people can afford is also good.

It’s not a case of public good, private badz but there is nuance and pros and cons.

permalink
report
parent
reply

Australian News

!news@aussie.zone

Create post

A place to share and discuss news relating to Australia and Australians.

Rules
  1. Follow the aussie.zone rules
  2. Keep discussions civil and respectful
  3. Exclude profanity from post titles
  4. Exclude excessive profanity from comments
  5. Satire is allowed, however post titles must be prefixed with [satire]
Recommended and Related Communities

Be sure to check out and subscribe to our related communities on aussie.zone:

Plus other communities for sport and major cities.

https://aussie.zone/communities

Banner: ABC

Community stats

  • 1

    Monthly active users

  • 173

    Posts

  • 199

    Comments