You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments View context

If it doesnt materially improve conditions for the third world then why do Latam social democracies get opposed by the imperial core?

because anglos are mad about it. a global south nation-state could do full capitalism but economically align with china or russia and anglos would mald and do a coup or another libya.

Pretty sure things are better in Bolivia under Evo then they would have been under the woman they couped into power there lol

of course.

at leas MAS is “movement toward socialism”. western/global north socdems are just trying to save capitalism and that’s why they’re moderate fascists.

permalink
report
parent
reply

Right. Doesnt sound likenwe disagre on much here. Whole point of me posting this is that global north socdems are social imperialists but the same cant he said of a social democracy in a country that isnt imperalist.

I do admit though that a latam social democracy isnt inherenrly worthy of support. Only if it resists imperialism.

permalink
report
parent
reply