You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments View context
11 points

Incentivizing the exploitation of children seems like a wonderful way to kill an obscene amount of children.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Charging more isn’t incentivizing.

permalink
report
parent
reply
11 points

And it isn’t incentivizing parents to push their children to work at increasingly younger ages? Even at the expense of school, social life, and development? Especially the poorest families?

You are reinventing the entire problem that created child labour to begin with.

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Pal, reading the entire thread will show you that I’m against child labor and cracking the joke that children should cost more to employ as a way to prevent cheap child labor.

It’s a joke. Child labor is bad. Goodnight.

permalink
report
parent
reply
10 points

Just ban it and force them to pay adult workers more

permalink
report
parent
reply
2 points

Well, yeah, child labor is not cool.

permalink
report
parent
reply

Reread your comment from the perspective of a family struggling to make ends meet

permalink
report
parent
reply
1 point

I think we are on the wrong page.

By charging I mean the wage. Charging more for a kid. I can see how my choice of words was confusing.

Let me reword it:

Requiring that children under 18 get an additional wage of $5/hr per year they are under 18 (17 = +5, 16 = +10, etc) is a way to discourage companies from hiring underage workers by making them cost more.

permalink
report
parent
reply

US News

!us_news@lemmygrad.ml

Create post

News from within the empire - From a leftist perspective

Community stats

  • 3

    Monthly active users

  • 1.6K

    Posts

  • 5.5K

    Comments

Community moderators