You are viewing a single thread.
View all comments
19 points

UK law is weird. Technically they’re right. In UK rape is defined as:

(1) A person (A) commits an offence if—

(a) he intentionally penetrates the vagina, anus or mouth of another person (B) with his penis,
(b) B does not consent to the penetration, and
(c) A does not reasonably believe that B consents.

But as it is worded, especially the first top comment, it reads like defining rape.

permalink
report
reply
17 points
*

Yeah, this is more of a redditor being pedantic (and another redditor not reading what they’re saying) than defending rape. “Well ackshually” meets “oh you aren’t immediately agreeing with everything I think??”

permalink
report
parent
reply
15 points
*

Its a law setup to discriminate against LGBT+ couples by diminishing any rape comitted against them,

It isnt considerd ‘rape’ unless its man raping a women.

Another ‘quirk’ of the UKs system which has a 3% conviction rate for rape

Its one of those things where they know the situation is completely fucked up so they just change how they record it rather than address it.

permalink
report
parent
reply
7 points

it’s not just UK. Many commonwealth countries has the same legal definition.

permalink
report
parent
reply

Are the Straights OK?

!arethestraightsok@lemmygrad.ml

Create post

Is someone holding these poor souls hostage and forcing them to be together?

Similar minority power projects:

Community stats

  • 1

    Monthly active users

  • 68

    Posts

  • 219

    Comments